nothing like a meeting of the world's superpower leaders to cause a frenzy in the otherwise docile metropolis we call T.O. And its funny how normally uninvolved citizens suddenly become activists, advocates, economists and political experts when one of the world's most important summits takes place in our backyard.
i have a few issues to address here: first, the comment made by several of my facebook friends expressing discontent over Toronto's transformation into a "police state" for the G20. you all clearly have not one iota of a semblance of a clue as to what a "police state" really is. a police state is a governmental situation where government exerts repressive control over the economic, social and political aspects of a country. if you're not smart enough to know the difference between this and what we had for the summit, then you're in no position to make a legitimate complaint....next, to all of you who complained about toronto hosting the summit. it is a big deal, however you want to slice it, for the world's leaders to choose our city to meet. a lot of you criticize the world's governments, including your own, for not addressing the issues, but we are unwilling to want to sacrifice a little of our convenient way of life to facilitate a forum for the possible addressing of some of these. the summit had to be held somewhere people, get over it....
now, i am not sure if the violent hooligans who stirred shit up downtown were genuinely passionate about issues or if they were just punks trying to get noticed, but either way, they are still inconsiderate douche-bags. in just one weekend they trashed toronto's hard-earned reputation as one of the most classy and well-behaved cities in the world. and for what? 15 minutes of fame? i hope those detained get 15 months in jail for their stupidity. and to the guy interviewed on cbc news who said "I just want to be here and be a part of this," I hope you got a rubber bullet in the face.
and i can never understand why protesters genuinely feel that marching and shouting will really make a difference in the world. especially since the majority of them are only part-time advocates who jump on the bandwagon of casual marxism and social justice when its most convenient to them. let's face it, ever since the first G8 meeting, world leaders have come to expect protesting of this nature, so the cries and chants and marches of protesters will always fall on deaf ears. governments know that after all the hype, the large mobilizations of people will dwindle down to sparse numbers as soon as conferences such as these are over.
and of the many cries heard this weekend, none were more furious than those bashing capitalism. i've been reading up some public debates (on FB) about capitalism, and i'm saddened that many people are either brainwashed by social mass media or fatalistically hardwired by capitalist controllers. no one i've heard has taken a middle ground; and this constant black and white clashing will get us nowhere until we realize that life pretty much always lies somewhere in the grey area.
capitalism is indeed the principle method in which liberal empires are spread and through which the wealthy and powerful continue to dominate at the expense of the poor and powerless. but the system is not the root of all evil; in order to figure out why all men are not equal in practice, we must look inward. it is the greed and lust of some men, and the unwillingness of others to give up their comfortable way of life to take action against this, that has caused to the enormous gap between the elite and the destitute.
indeed we need to hold our leaders to account for their mismanagement, corruption and insensitivity to the human condition; but most are unwilling to make the real sacrifices necessary; and then we blame it all on capitalism. but to all you protesters, let me ask you this question: how many of you buy food at the local farmer's market, or grow your own food in kitchen gardens? how many buy clothes from the local tailor? how many of us give up driving altogether and commit irrevocably to public transit, to reduce carbon emissions? how many of us see garbage lying on the side of the road, and make time to pick it up? how many of us take a few dollars out of our paycheck to help sponsor a starving child in Africa, or to send supplies to Doctors Without Borders? How many hours do you spend at the local homeless shelter or orphanage? how many products do you KNOW, or even suspect are made in sweat shops, but you buy them anyway? how many of you forgo that resort vacation and opt instead to go to a poor country to help build a school or a hospital? how many are willing to devote the majority of your time doing genuine, long-term advocacy for issues instead of yapping traps in large, periodic groups? come on people, the governments definitely need to do so much better, but so do we; so lets stop passing the buck and screaming at someone else to fix the world, and let's own up to our own responsibility as Earthlings and as human beings.
and if you still cant see yourself committing to the cause, there is still another better way for your voices to be heard and to ensure that governments at least take your issues a little more seriously....its called voting
Dear "Professor" Matti, I can't blame you for your misguided vision of police sate and democracy. You did claim your mind is idle. Instead of validating your moronic musing with a long reply I will just mention three things that will point out your idiocy.
ReplyDeleteFirst, Democracy is more than voting. If you believe the only way your voice is heard is by voting every 4 years then perhaps you need to understand the importance of civil society and association. Democracy is about participation, an engaged population, not a lazy population that believe their responsibility ends at voting every 4 years.
Second, stop being a presumptuous asshole. How do you know the "protesters" don't work at local food markets or don't grow their own food? Even if they don't who are you to question it? And what makes you think they have to do all those things to show that they care? Everyone is entitled to their own concern and how they wish to express it. You are happy with just voting, that was your recommendation. Don't impose it on others.
Third, thank you for trying to teach us about police state. You are quickly confusing an authoritarian state with a police state but I don't blame you. They are easy to confuse. In a police state the police has an unequal power distribution that is not safeguarded through legal limits. That is the law enforcement side, you are confusing it with the political side of an authoritarian state. At the G20 the police showed incredible power without the bounds of the Canadian constitution. They detained and searched anyone that they wanted. Arbitrary search and seizure is against the Canadian constitution. That is why most commentators have noted parts of Toronto became a police state.
Open your own mind and educate yourself first before becoming an ignorant, arrogant, judgmental, condescending "Professor".
^ To the individual above
ReplyDeleteI would like to start by pointing out the validity, or rather, lack of validity from your first argument. If these protestors really did own or work at small businesses, what right do they have to destroy others?
If everyone truly is entitled to the way they express their own opinion, anarchy will be rampant.
Secondly, there is a reason why the police exist. Their job is to maintain law and order within the boundaries of the state they are stationed in. Seeing as several individuals felt the need to cause mayhem and destruction downtown, I was not surprised when the police made several hundreds of arrests. I understand that they could not take any chances. These individuals were large in numbers, and could strike any time and anywhere within that particular area. In fact, I applaud the various measures that the police forces have established against these hooligans.
Third of all, evidently you have never heard of animal instinct. Many of these people are merely followers of certain individuals, and are only motivated to seek a few moments of entertainment and infamy, as shown by the Black Bloc. There were a few groups who had valid reasons to protest, but overall, the warm and clean reputation that Toronto has maintained was completely tarnished. The people of Toronto knew that the G20 would be held here, and that certain measures would be taken to establish that the event goes forward without delay or incident. Protesting will have a limited effect on stifling it.
My final word of advice to you, "Anonymous".
Think and read carefully before you write, you "ignorant, arrogant, judgemental, condescending protestor."
Hosting the G20 in Toronto was a huge mistake, but since Haper's party never has a shot here I guess it won't have an effect in terms of his polls, but that is no reason to host it in this city. Also, the rioters where a minority, the police let them run free on saturday, and then on sunday realizing they screwed up clamped down hard on everyone and most of the victims where innocent people. I will say overall they did a good job (no deaths and no serious damage), and most of the mistakes where due to the organizers and not individual officers, but that dose not excuse the fact that civil liberties were violated and this sets a very horrible precedent that will unfortunately go unpunished.
ReplyDeleteto the first individual who commented, i thank you sincerely for your point of view. i thank you for also exercising your freedom of speech in calling me names of various sorts.
ReplyDeletewhen you carry a certain point of view fixated in your mind, it is difficult for you to see logic in other people's, and it is easy to find "flaws" in their arguments. however, if you are going to "educate" me, you need to come much better than this.
you say that the police had an "incredible power with no legal limits" which was "unconstitutional"; i say to you, quote me the section of the constitution that backs this up. also, you say they "detained and searched anyone they wanted"; that is a ridiculous claim...the fact of the matter is, the actions of a few idiots forced them to take preventive action, to make sure that the situation was contained and avoid further damage to people's personal property as well as to people's physical person...
and as for the definition of "police state"...even if in your narrow minded view mine is wrong, your substitute definition still certainly does not apply to the G20 situation...
now,you are definitely twisting my motives around by insinuating that i call for voting as the ONLY way to express one's opinion; you are correct in saying that everyone has the right to a voice; so the protesters have a right to march and shout in the street; and this, if done peacefully, is a good way to shed light on the problems; but thats not all it takes. i wasnt questioning the rights of protesters at all. i was questioning their true dedication to the cause....if one truly wants to see change, one must live for the cause...mahatma gandhi lead protests and marches, but he also set a shining example to his followers by living a humble life, by treating his fellow men with respect and by helping to educate people....nelson mandela didnt just protest about racism, he got himself into politics and used this a firm platform to spread his beliefs to others...your attempt to cover for any hypocrites and bandwagon-jumpers among those who were genuinely concerned with the issues last weekend is unfortunate...if voting is not enough, organize forums, hold referendums, fundraisers, do SOMETHING ELSE in addition to outright protesting...and dont bash capitalism outright if we all in some way or other subscribe to it...governments are never going to listen to protests such as these, especially if protests turn out the way last week's did...we need to do better..
if you think i am an idiot because you disagree with me, then you are too closed-minded to find any value in what i say...it doesnt change the fact that everyday, children are dying, the earth is being destroyed, people's rights are being violated, despite the fact that ALL OF US AS INDIVIDUALS have a chance to directly make a difference by making concrete sacrifices instead of just judging and complaining...
while it is all well and good to have a different opinion to matti, state your point whilst still respecting your fellow man. there is no need for name calling.
ReplyDelete